Jan Ernst Matzeliger: Inventor

It may be difficult to see how the Inventor of the shoe-lacing machine changed the dynamic of the Americas, but Jan Matzenliger’s invention proved to turn South America’s underdeveloped workforce into a capitalist paradise at the turn of the 20th Century.

Matzeliger was born in Paramaribo (the capital city of then Dutch Guyana, now Suriname) on 15th September 1852. His father was a wealthy and well educated Dutch engineer of German descent living in Dutch Guyana and his mother was a Black Surinamese slave of African descent.

At the age of ten, Matzeliger was apprenticed in the machine shops run by his father, where Matzeliger developed an interest in machinery and mechanics. He had some interest in mechanics in his native country, but it was only after settling in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania at 19 after working as a sailor, Matzeliger, turned his interest of machinery and mechanics into a career once he began working in a machinery shop.

By 1877, he spoke English to an adequate level and had moved to moved to Massachusetts.

The World Changing Invention

In the early days of shoe making, shoes were made mainly by hand. For proper fit, the customer’s feet had to be duplicated in size and form by creating a stone or wooden mould called a “last” from which the shoes were sized and shaped.

Since the greatest difficulty in shoe making was the actual assembly of the soles to the upper shoe, it required great skill to tack and sew the two components together. It was thought that such intricate work could only be done by skilled, human hands. As a result, shoe lasters held great power over the shoe industry. They would hold work stoppages without regard for their fellow workers’ desires, resulting in long periods of unemployment for them.

After a while, he went to work in the Harney Brothers Shoes factory. At the time, no machine could attach the upper part of a shoe to the sole. This had to be done manually by a “hand laster”; a skilled one could produce 50 pairs in a ten-hour day.

After five years of work, Matzeliger obtained a patent for his invention in 1883. His machine could produce between 150 to 700 pairs of shoes a day, cutting shoe prices across the nation in half. He sacrificed his health working exhausting hours on his invention and not eating over long periods of time, he caught a cold which quickly developed into tuberculosis.
His early death in Lynn, Massachusetts from tuberculosis meant he never saw the full profit of his invention. He died at age 36 on August 24, 1889.

Jan Ernst Matzeliger’s invention was perhaps “the most important invention for New England.” His invention was “the greatest forward step in the shoe industry,” according to the church bulletin of The First Church of Christ (the same church that took him as a member) as part of a commemoration held in 1967 in his honour. Yet, because of the colour of his skin, he was not mentioned in the history books until recently.

In recognition of his accomplishment, he was honoured on a U.S. postage stamp on September 15, 1991.

Jan Ernst Matzeliger’s Patents

274,207, 3/20/1883, Automatic method for lasting shoe

421,954, 2/25/1890, Nailing machine

423,937, 3/25/1890, Tack separating and distributing mechanism

459,899, 9/22/1891, Lasting machine

415,726, 11/26/1899, Mechanism for distributing tacks, nails, etc.

467,840, 7/24/1891, The second advanced lasting shoe machine



Thanks for helping me

His dad was of a Dutchman white German descent, and his mum was a Surinamese lady of black African descent. So why ignore his white heritage and label him a black african?

At that time in the United States you were considered to be black even if you were bi-racial. The one-drop (of black blood) rule reigned supreme and it was the law of the land. The question we should ask is why did the U.S. see fit to ignore his white heritage and concentrate solely upon the black heritage of his mother? And why does it even matter? The answer to these questions are still being sorted out; even in 2017!

Why is it an issue now when a bi racial is called black? It has always been the rule in white countries to consider a bi racial as black. What’s wrong now with that?

At the end of the day, he will still be seen as black. The fact that his father was white doesn’t exclude him from the struggles that blacks faced back then or now. I myself have a white mother and a black father, the first time i dealt with the prejudices of a white person was in 5th grade. When i told them of my white mother, the boy replied “but you’re not white” while pointing to his skin. So, yes it does matter that he is seen as black instead of bi-racial.

I learned a lot from your biographical information about Jan Ernst Matzeliger. But….in your intro you called his invention a shoe ‘lacing’ machine . It was a shoe lasting machine. You misspelled his name . There is no letter N in Matzeliger. And you spoke of South America’s ‘under developed workforce’. He invented and patented his machine in the U.S. It changed the world, not merely Suriname. .

‘It may be difficult to see how the Inventor of the shoe-lacing machine changed the dynamic of the Americas, but Jan Matzenliger’s invention proved to turn South America’s underdeveloped workforce into a capitalist paradise at the turn of the 20th Century.

We have been ignore forever, although many slaves were raped by their white slave master and bore children, it mattered not. They chose to ignore that they were partially white as so to capitalize from slavery and certainly treated the child as less than if the child had a black parent. Blacks didn’t start it, Blacks had no choice. He was and is considered black in general.

I love this article I’m just curious to know what happen to his stock in the company once he passed??

Wow. That was really good.

01/ 02/ 2020
As a bi- racial it has been hell on EARTH as mixed child.In the black community nobody accepts you neither in the white community…..! But by- law you considered BLACK and am PROUD to grow up as a black MAN and achieve my DREAMS..! REGARDLESS OF COLOR but as a HUMAN BEING….!

At the end it says what patents he recieved and what date he got them, but why does it say he got some in 1890 when it also says he died in 1889???

Post a comment